📢 Gate Square #Creator Campaign Phase 1# is now live – support the launch of the PUMP token sale!
The viral Solana-based project Pump.Fun ($PUMP) is now live on Gate for public sale!
Join the Gate Square Creator Campaign, unleash your content power, and earn rewards!
📅 Campaign Period: July 11, 18:00 – July 15, 22:00 (UTC+8)
🎁 Total Prize Pool: $500 token rewards
✅ Event 1: Create & Post – Win Content Rewards
📅 Timeframe: July 12, 22:00 – July 15, 22:00 (UTC+8)
📌 How to Join:
Post original content about the PUMP project on Gate Square:
Minimum 100 words
Include hashtags: #Creator Campaign
Analysis of Legal Risks and Criminal Boundaries of Individual Private Currency Exchange
Discussion on the Legal Risks and Boundaries of Personal Exchange Currency
How to cope with insufficient foreign exchange quota for studying abroad? Is it safe and legal to exchange foreign currency privately? Many people seek private currency exchange channels, such as currency exchange scalpers, underground banks, or foreign exchange companies, to avoid the annual foreign exchange limit of $50,000 per person.
So, what legal risks are involved in personal Exchange Currency? Is it illegal to help others exchange foreign currency? If it is illegal, what are the legal risk boundaries?
1. The Difference Between Administrative Penalties and Criminal Penalties
Many people seeking legal advice often say: "Fines are acceptable, but I cannot go to jail." From a legal perspective, the difference between "fines" and "jail time" lies in whether the behavior is classified as an administrative violation or a criminal offense.
Even if one does not understand the relevant legal provisions, most people have a simple understanding of private Exchange Currency: if the Exchange Currency is for personal use and not for profit (to earn exchange rate differences), or if one is merely introducing others to Exchange Currency channels, it may be illegal but should not constitute a criminal offense.
2. Complexity of Applicable Law
The application of law in judicial practice is often quite complex. Why are certain actions, although not explicitly defined as criminal by law, still subject to investigation in practice? This involves multiple factors, among which the lagging nature of the law and the judicial authorities' broad interpretation of the law are among the important reasons.
The lagging nature of the law refers to the difficulty of lawmaking in keeping pace with social development. For example, in recent years, there have been multiple cases related to digital collectible platforms, but there is still a lack of clear legal regulations to guide them.
The broad interpretation of the law by judicial authorities can be reflected in the legal provisions related to private Exchange Currency.
3. The Ambiguous Boundaries of Criminal Risk
"Boundary" is a frequently used term by consultants. The average person often believes that there is a clear line distinguishing criminal risks from other legal risks (civil, administrative). However, legal issues are actually quite complex, and the final outcome of an event may be caused by multiple factors. Even if a boundary can be defined, there will be many variables and unforeseen circumstances in practical execution.
IV. Case Comparison: Same Case, Different Judgments
In the discussion of illegal foreign exchange trading, it is necessary to mention the famous Liu Han case and the Huang Guangyu case. The defendants in both cases had similar reasons for exchanging currency (repaying overseas gambling debts) and similar methods of exchanging currency (matched orders), but the final verdicts were completely different.
The final judgment of the Liu Han case found that the defendant did not constitute the crime of illegal business operation, while the Huang Guangyu case was found guilty. Analyzing the judgment, it can be seen that the Liu Han case took into account that although the actor had the objective behavior of Exchange Currency, it was determined that the purpose of the Exchange Currency was to repay overseas gambling debts, which did not have a profit-making purpose and did not constitute business behavior. In contrast, the judgment of the Huang Guangyu case completely did not discuss whether the defendant had a profit-making purpose, but was entangled in the question of whether "the act of repaying foreign exchange gambling debts in RMB constitutes buying and selling foreign exchange," which led to an erroneous judgment result.
V. Conclusion
In criminal cases, even if a case has been filed, there may still be a turnaround by thoroughly analyzing individual cases and uncovering strong defense points. However, it should be noted that although private currency exchange methods such as "foreign exchange arbitrage" are relatively concealed, relevant trading parties are rarely investigated for a single transaction. However, once related trading parties are investigated, it may implicate upstream and downstream parties, and the amount of administrative penalties can be significant. Furthermore, if one inadvertently receives illicit funds due to currency exchange, there may be risks of having bank cards frozen or being suspected of aiding in computer network crime or concealing and disguising proceeds of crime.
Therefore, citizens should abide by the law and not have a mentality of luck, so as to avoid being involved in related legal risks and causing unnecessary trouble.