📢 Gate Square #MBG Posting Challenge# is Live— Post for MBG Rewards!
Want a share of 1,000 MBG? Get involved now—show your insights and real participation to become an MBG promoter!
💰 20 top posts will each win 50 MBG!
How to Participate:
1️⃣ Research the MBG project
Share your in-depth views on MBG’s fundamentals, community governance, development goals, and tokenomics, etc.
2️⃣ Join and share your real experience
Take part in MBG activities (CandyDrop, Launchpool, or spot trading), and post your screenshots, earnings, or step-by-step tutorials. Content can include profits, beginner-friendl
What Happened When I Reached Out to 50 Tech and Crypto CEOs Cold: No Ads, No Clout
I didn’t plan to email 50 CEOs. I just wanted to test one idea.
Can a well-written cold email still get results in 2025 especially in an oversaturated space like tech and crypto?
Turns out, yes if you do it right.
I didn’t have a huge newsletter. No warm intros. No VC behind me. Just a desire to start conversations with smart people doing interesting things in tech, SaaS, and Web3.
Here’s how I approached it and what happened next.
Why I Picked 50 CEOs (and Why Many Were from Crypto)
The idea came out of frustration.
I was tired of waiting on referrals, algorithm “reach,” or time-wasting discovery calls. So I decided to go direct.
I picked 50 people who were building things that genuinely interested me tools, platforms, and protocols across SaaS, dev tools, and especially Web3 and crypto infrastructure.
Roughly 40% of my list were founders or execs at crypto-native startups Layer 2 chains, NFT platforms, DeFi tools, even a DAO tooling service.
Why crypto?
Because despite the noise, the signal is strong. Many Web3 teams are solving real problems and moving fast. And they’re open to collaboration if you speak their language and respect their time.
Building a Targeted List (Without Paying for Tools)
I didn’t buy lists. I didn’t use a scraping tool.
Here’s how I built my outreach list:
Yes, it took longer. But that effort meant I wasn’t sending blind messages to people who’d never care.
What My Emails Actually Said
Here’s the basic structure I followed, which worked across both Web2 and Web3 founders:
1. Line 1: Something specific to them – a launch, quote, product, tweet, or blog
2. Line 2: The offer – what I can help with, clearly stated
3. Line 3: An easy, non-pushy call to action (CTA)
No intros like “Hope this finds you well.” No pitch decks attached. No desperation.
An example:
Subject: Thought this could support your onboarding
Hey [Name], just saw your rollout of gasless wallet signups, very slick.
I’ve been working on a simple onboarding flow that cuts drop-off by 40% on cold wallets. Might be worth testing.
Want me to send a 1-pager?
I used a similar structure for non-crypto founders, replacing onboarding/gas wallet language with SaaS-specific terms like “demo setup” or “sales ops.”
The Results (Short Version)
Here’s what happened after I hit “send”:
And no – I didn’t get blocked, flagged, or blacklisted.
What Helped Me Get Replies
1. Crypto founders notice when you know their space
You don’t need to flex jargon, but you do need to show understanding.
One reply literally started with:
“Appreciate that you didn’t try to explain what a wallet is…”
Referencing real features (zk-rollups, L2 bridges, token gating) in a natural way helped me stand out from the endless “marketing for Web3” emails they usually ignore.
2. Specific, tangible outcomes
Instead of saying “We increase efficiency,” I wrote:
“Reduced support tickets by 25% in a community of 10,000+ wallet users.”
Crypto founders especially want data and brevity. They’re allergic to hand-waving.
3. Clear, casual CTAs
I avoided scheduling links and long booking funnels.
Instead, I offered low-commitment next steps like:
CTAs that felt like a conversation not a funnel.
Why Some Messages Flopped
Not everything worked. Here’s what didn’t:
1. Over-explaining
One early draft started with three lines about my background. Deleted.
Founders don’t care unless it relates to them.
2. Being generic
An email that said “We help digital brands improve onboarding” went nowhere. Too vague.
3. Bad subject lines
“Touching base” = the spam folder.
“Crypto growth idea for [Company]” = open + reply.
Tools I Used (Spoiler: You Don’t Need Many)
Want a quick Clay review? It’s flexible, fast, and lets you build smart workflows. Definitely saved me hours once I figured it out. But the tool didn’t do the writing. The message did.
Follow-Ups: Where 40% of Replies Came From
Most people didn’t respond to the first email. But when I followed up (politely, 4 days later), replies came in.
Best follow-up tactics:
Don’t just bump the thread. Move it forward.
What I’d Do Differently Next Time
This test was just the beginning. If I scale this again, here’s how I’d evolve:
Also, I’d dig deeper into tools that combine outreach and enrichment. I spent time reading Zoominfo pricing and feature breakdowns. It helped me understand what’s worth paying for as I scale this out.
A stronger tool stack might help me scale but in this first round, simplicity won.
Final Takeaway: Cold Outreach Still Works: Even in Web3
Here’s the big truth I learned:
You don’t need a huge network or paid ad strategy to get in front of smart, busy people.
You need:
Crypto founders are no different. If you speak to their mission, respect their time, and bring value, they will respond. Just don’t waste their time. And definitely don’t call them “Web3 ninjas.”