The next stop for Decentralized Finance: @Arbitrum is becoming a testing ground for "institutional-grade play".



To be honest, many people still view Layer 2 as a "cheap version of Ethereum," thinking of it merely as a transitional solution for speeding up transactions and reducing costs.

But if you take a closer look at the projects emerging on @Arbitrum, you'll notice an interesting phenomenon: some "atypical Decentralized Finance" things are sprouting here—like Tender, which we just talked about a few days ago, focusing on institutional-level RWA liquidation, and today I discovered a protocol called @ionprotocol that directly brings the "repo market" from traditional finance onto the chain.

Ion's model is actually very "old money": it involves collateral lending on on-chain government bonds, but adds a repurchase agreement play. In simple terms, you can collateralize your US Treasury bond certificates (like Ondo's OUSG) to Ion, borrow stablecoins, and simultaneously agree to buy back the bonds at a fixed interest rate at a certain future point in time. This "term-based collateral lending" is a trillion-dollar market in TradFi, where banks and hedge funds play every day, but hardly anyone touches it in DeFi—because it’s too "not crypto".

But the data from Ion is very interesting: within 3 months of its launch, the TVL surged to 200 million USD, and the average daily repurchase trading volume exceeded 10 million. What does this indicate? The Arbitrum ecosystem has begun to attract "non-meme funds." Institutional players who find the Ethereum mainnet too expensive and consider Solana too "retail" are using this as a testing ground.

The more exciting part is Ion's expansion strategy: they have integrated Chainlink's CCIP, directly cross-chain enabling the repurchase market. For example, if you collateralize government bonds on Arbitrum to borrow USDC, you can then use CCIP to transfer funds to the Base chain to invest in some new project, and it will automatically liquidate and repay at maturity. This combination of "traditional financial instruments + cross-chain leverage" is tailor-made for hedge fund strategies.

Why Arbitrum? Three words: ecological niche vacuum. The Ethereum mainnet is too expensive, Solana is too much of a casino, while Arbitrum has enough institutional-level infrastructure (like Gelato's automation and Chainlink's oracles), and a stronger DeFi native community than Polygon. Just look at the recently emerging projects—Tender, Rho, Ion—they are all filling the "complex financial needs" gap.

Perhaps the narrative of the next cycle is no longer about "which chain's meme is crazier," but rather "which chain can first chew through the bones of TradFi." At least for now, Arbitrum seems to have squatted into a good starting position.
#Animayhem # Arbitrum #Web3Gaming # AIgaming
DEFI-2.28%
ARB7.96%
ETH4.66%
RWA5.74%
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)