"Warning: The @Arbitrum ecosystem has encountered 'protocol vampires'! How to counter the play people for suckers?"



Cruel reality:

70% of the 300+ projects are "play people for suckers" traps, but the remaining 30% hide hundredfold opportunities.

Real case: A player focused on interacting with niche protocols, with airdrop earnings surpassing the total Gas fees of the mainnet over 5 years.

Survival rules:

Three essential elements of the protocol inspection:
Is Chainlink used for price feeding? (to prevent manipulation)
Does the team address change frequently? (Prevent running away)
Does the token economics have a burn mechanism? (Anti-inflation)

Anti-play people for suckers strategy:
Batch interaction at a fixed time each week (save Gas)
Prioritize DEXs with "trading rebates" (such as Camelot)

Ultimate Move:
Pledging ARB in DAO governance, voting rights themselves are a scarce resource.

Counterintuitive conclusion:
"On Arbitrum, 'laziness' is the most expensive habit—every missed interaction could mean missing out on the next ARBI airdrop."

#Animayhem # Arbitrum #Web3Gaming # AIgaming
ARB6.23%
LINK5.07%
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)