Recently, there has been a significant development in the field of financial regulation in South Korea. The Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) issued a directive to domestic asset management companies, requiring them to adjust their exchange-traded fund (ETF) portfolios to limit exposure to investments in crypto assets-related companies such as Coinbase and Strategy.



This decision stems from the administrative guidelines issued by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of South Korea in 2017, which explicitly prohibit regulated financial institutions from holding, purchasing, or making equity investments in virtual assets. The Financial Supervisory Service, as the executing agency of the FSC, is strictly enforcing this policy.

However, this regulatory measure has sparked considerable controversy in the South Korean financial sector. Many financial practitioners believe that this approach may lead to an unfair competitive environment. They point out that, compared to institutional investors, retail investors can still indirectly invest in crypto asset companies by purchasing US ETFs, and this differential treatment has caused dissatisfaction within the industry.

In this regard, an official from the Financial Supervisory Service stated that even if the regulatory environment in the US and South Korea changes, financial institutions must still comply with existing guidelines until new regulations are introduced. This statement reflects the cautious attitude of regulators towards investment issues related to Crypto Assets.

This regulatory action reflects the ongoing concern of South Korean financial authorities regarding the risks of crypto assets investment. As the primary regulatory body for the financial industry in South Korea, this decision by the Financial Supervisory Service will undoubtedly have a profound impact on the landscape of crypto assets investment in South Korea.

As the global crypto assets market continues to develop, regulatory agencies in various countries are actively exploring how to find a balance between encouraging financial innovation and preventing systemic risks. South Korea's recent regulatory measures may serve as a reference for other countries and have sparked discussions on how to formulate more inclusive and effective crypto assets regulatory policies.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseLandlordvip
· 11h ago
Isn't the control in South Korea just too ridiculous?
View OriginalReply0
SybilSlayervip
· 11h ago
With such strict regulation, what do retail investors have to fear?
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxietyvip
· 11h ago
So ruthless, retail investors win again.
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGodvip
· 11h ago
Retail investors can win again
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobbervip
· 11h ago
Why is it again that South Korea is causing trouble?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)