Last night, I compared the effects of Koge limit malicious swiping in Wallet and exchange. Through practical operation, I found that the wear from Wallet malicious swiping is approximately twice that of the exchange. Specifically, the wear generated by swiping 16384 in Wallet is basically equivalent to that of limit swiping 8192 in the exchange.

Although malicious swiping on the exchange may reduce a few transactions, the current Wallet offers a fee rebate activity, making Wallet malicious swiping more attractive. Unless the exchange introduces similar promotional activities, from the overall cost and revenue perspective, Wallet malicious swiping seems to be more reliable.

It is worth noting that when choosing a malicious swiping platform, one should not only consider wear and fees but also pay attention to the platform's security, liquidity, and potential additional gains. Before making a decision, users are advised to comprehensively evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each platform and choose the solution that best fits their needs. At the same time, it is also important to keep an eye on market dynamics and changes in platform policies in order to adjust strategies in a timely manner.